• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly
Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [2002] No such file or directory

California

Can we require ‘English-only’ at work? Foreign-language chatter is affecting morale

06/16/2011
Q. Some of our employees speak to each other in their native language. We are worried that some workers will feel excluded. To boost employee morale, we would like to institute a policy prohibiting our workers from speaking any language other than English during the workday. Is such a policy legal?

Supreme Court upholds Arizona immigration law, backs E-Verify

06/16/2011
The U.S. Supreme Court has concluded that federal immigration law does not pre-empt or invalidate an Arizona law that subjects Arizona employers to sanctions for knowingly or intentionally employing unauthorized workers and requiring them to use the federal government’s E-Verify online employment eligibility verification system.

Sex harassment, retaliation cost gourmet company $535K

06/16/2011
Monterey Gourmet Foods, a Salinas specialty foods maker, will pay $535,000 to settle an EEOC lawsuit alleging a supervisor sexually har­assed workers, who were fired after they complained.

Cal/OSHA puts heat on contractor after flash fire injures welder

06/16/2011
The California Division of Occu­pa­tional Safety and Health has fined a public works contractor more than $235,000—and threatened to put it out of business and criminally prosecute executives—after a welder suffered severe burns in a workplace flash fire.

LAPD pays huge judgment for sexual orientation retaliation

06/16/2011
A state court jury has awarded more than $1 million to a Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) sergeant who sued the department for retali­a­tion after he complained about shoddy treatment because he is gay.

Employee cites mental distress? Ask for mental exam

06/16/2011
Employees who sue but can’t show they suffered any monetary damages sometimes claim mental distress instead. Fortunately, courts don’t just take their word it, especially if the employee claims she had to undergo psychiatric treatment.

Know the other side’s Achilles’ heel! Plaintiffs must act fast to win court injunctions

06/16/2011

Once a lawsuit has been filed, courts sometimes issue immediate orders—called injunctions—to prevent irre­parable harm. But to get an injunction, the party seeking the order has to show what harm could occur—and convince the court it will probably win the case on its merits. That’s unlikely if the litigant waits too long to ask for relief.

Follow up after bias complaint to make sure employee isn’t experiencing retaliation

06/16/2011

Taken separately, what a supervisor does or says to an employee who has filed a complaint might not equal retaliation. But if the slights add up, the picture changes. That’s why you should follow up several times with each complaining employee to verify there’s no pattern of retaliation.

Disabled employee can’t work at all? You can terminate without violating FEHA

06/16/2011
The California Fair Employment and Housing Act doesn’t require employers to provide unlimited time off for employees with disabilities. The fact is, employees with disabilities are still expected to come to work (at least some of the time) and perform the essential functions of their jobs with or without accommodations while they are there.

Owner, foreman get jail time for worker’s fatal plummet

06/16/2011
A California court has sentenced a company owner and a foreman to a year in jail for allowing unsafe working conditions that led to a roofer’s accidental death.