• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

ADA

ADA: ‘Toxic’ work site (plus toxic boss) doesn’t necessarily create disability

08/02/2010

It happens. Some working relationships between bosses and their direct reports are so toxic that employees suffer psychological problems. Sometimes the tension is so bad that employees believe they’re disabled and therefore entitled to transfer to another job under another supervisor. That isn’t the case.

Is worker fit for duty? Limit medical inquiries to essential functions

08/02/2010

You aren’t allowed to delve into an employee’s medical history or disabilities when the employee wants to keep the information private—unless you can show a clear job-related reason for doing so. To qualify as job-related, your inquiry must be narrowly tailored to assess whether the employee is capable of performing the essential functions of the job. Broad questions often run afoul of the law.

Unsure about your accommodations obligations? Find out fast–or risk personal liability

07/27/2010
The Pennsylvania Human Rights Act is the commonwealth’s companion to federal employment laws such as the ADA and Title VII. The PHRA goes beyond most federal laws because it authorizes personal liability for those who “aid and abet” an act of discrimination. And as one recent case shows, aiding and abetting can include making a serious mistake about a reasonable accommodation request.

He said he didn’t need ADA help? Then he can’t sue for it

07/27/2010

Some disabled individuals may fear that prospective employers won’t hire them if they request an accommodation. They may even try to reassure employers they’re perfectly capable of doing the job without any help. Take them at their word. They can’t later claim they didn’t get an accommodation.

Keep health costs out of the equation when considering hiring and firing

07/27/2010
Before you even consider firing (or refusing to hire) someone because they might jack up your health insurance costs, count your dollars, not your pennies. You may be staring down a lawsuit that could dwarf whatever premium costs you hoped to avoid.

First suggestion needn’t be last word: You’re free to choose reasonable accommodation

07/23/2010

When an employee asks for a reasonable ADA accommodation for a disability, you don’t have to accept her first suggestion. You are under no obligation to provide the employee’s preferred accommodation if you have another one that’s also reasonable.

Beware bias claims when accommodations differ

07/23/2010
Overlapping issues often make it even harder for HR pros to deal with difficult situations. For example, addressing the needs of two disabled employees can turn into a discrimination lawsuit if they belong to different protected classes and you come up with different accommodations.

HIV case shines spotlight on ADAAA’s broader disability definition

07/09/2010
A recent court case sheds light on whether HIV is a disability under the ADA Amendments Act of 2008. In Horgan v. Simmons, the court held that an HIV-positive man who was terminated after disclosing his medical condition to his supervisor could pursue an employment discrimination claim under the ADA. This case reflects the trend toward broader protection under the ADA.

Balance Staffing blindsided by recruiter’s ADA lawsuit

07/09/2010
Balance Staffing’s short-sighted treatment of a visually impaired recruiter will cost it $100,000 to settle a disability discrimination suit.

Don’t ask for unlimited medical exam consent

07/08/2010
Under the ADA, medical exams are allowed only if needed to determine whether an employee requires a reasonable accommodation or if the employer believes the employee will be unable to safely perform the job. But can employers require employees to agree to more extensive medical examinations as a condition of employment? Probably not.