• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Discrimination / Harassment

Delete your liability: Copy Xerox response to harassment complaint

04/29/2011
You can’t prevent every vulgar act an employee may commit. But you can and should act fast when you learn about misbehavior. As the response by Xerox managers in the following case shows, a single incident that doesn’t involve outrageous behavior or a physical assault typically isn’t sexual harassment in the eyes of the court—unless the employer ignores the incident and allows the problem to escalate.

Can we offer cash incentives for employees to opt out of our health insurance plan?

04/28/2011
Q. We’re trying to reduce our group health benefit costs. Several employees are on both our plan and that of their spouses. They are willing to go off our group plan if we compensate them a certain amount of money each month. Is it legal to offer either medical insurance benefits or a cash alternative?

Philadelphia approves new Fair Employment Practices Code

04/28/2011
Philadelphia has amended its fair-employment practices ordinance to add three new classes. Now, employers in the city may not discriminate against employees on the basis of any genetic information they may gather, an employee’s status as a victim of domestic or sexual violence, or an employee’s familial status.

Age discrimination claim may bar other claims

04/28/2011
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that to prove age discrimination, employees have to show that age was the sole reason for an adverse employment action. That usually means employees can’t claim that other types of discrimination were also in play.

Is employee really disabled? Use common sense

04/28/2011

When it comes to deciding whether to grant reasonable accommodations, the first step is to determine whether the employee is really disabled. A diagnosis isn’t the last word. Does the condition actually limit the employee in some substantial way?

The key is consistency: Similar wrongdoings deserve similar discipline

04/26/2011

While employees who break rules usually expect to be punished, they also expect to be treated fairly. That’s why it’s important for man­agers and HR to strive for consistency in all discipline. Never punish one em­­ployee more harshly than someone else who committed the same infraction.

Jehovah’s Witness gets last ‘ho ho ho’ in Belk case

04/25/2011
The Belk department store chain has agreed to pay a former employee $55,000 to settle her religious discrimination suit. The employee, a practicing Jehovah’s Witness, was fired after she refused to wear a Santa hat during the store’s Christmas promotions.

Goodyear’s defense falls flat, inflates employee’s wallet

04/25/2011
A five-week trial in Cumberland County has ended in a win for a former manager at Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.’s Fayetteville plant. The jury awarded the employee $450,000 in compensatory damages for retaliation and emotional distress.

Court orders exam: Did harassment cause PTSD?

04/25/2011
Good news for employers fighting claims of men­­tal harm: Courts have begun or­­dering mental exams when employees claim that a specific mental illness such as post-traumatic stress disorder was caused by harassment or bias. That may discourage claims.

Bad faith by EEOC? Ask court to make it pay

04/25/2011

Usually, the EEOC leaves liti­­gation to em­­ployees and their attorneys. But when the EEOC decides to take the lead, chances are it believes the case is worth fighting for—tooth and nail. When that happens, employers can ex­­pect to spend a bundle defending themselves. Fortunately, federal judges will level that playing field if they believe the EEOC didn’t play fair.