• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Discrimination / Harassment

Vague bias claims won’t get far in federal court

02/07/2011
Some former employees think that filing a federal lawsuit is the best way to build up their bank accounts after being fired. Their complaints are often short on detail. Courts are beginning to toss out those complaints.

Court: Bigger workload could constitute retaliation

02/07/2011
When you warn supervisors not to retaliate against employees who complain about alleged discrimination, include this reminder: Seemingly little things—like increasing the employee’s workload or nit-picking about performance issues—can lead to a retaliation lawsuit.

Applicant has solid work history? That’s a legitimate reason for promotion

02/07/2011
Sometimes, it’s hard to distinguish one applicant from another. That’s especially true for unskilled positions. How do you choose? If one of the factors you use is work history, rest assured it is unlikely your choice will be challenged successfully.

Play it straight: When employee’s complaints become irrational, stick with sound procedures

02/07/2011

After a discrimination complaint has been found to be without merit, most reasonable employees accept their employer’s conclusions and go back to doing their jobs. But some become bitter, suspecting that HR and management are out to get them and interpreting every subsequent interaction as evidence of a hostile conspiracy. When this happens, the worst thing you can do is play into the fear.

Nacogdoches ATV dealer faces constructive discharge suit

02/07/2011
A former secretary at a Nacogdoches vehicle dealership says the sexual harassment there was so severe she had no choice but to quit. That’s the definition of “constructive discharge,” and it’s the basis of the lawsuit Jennifer Burch has filed against Eastex Tractor & Powersports.

You’re not a doctor! Don’t restrict pregnant employee’s work unless her physician says so

02/07/2011
Some old-school managers cling to outdated notions about how to treat pregnant employees. Kind gestures are fine, but watch out if a manager’s overprotectiveness results in women being denied promotions or opportunities to work when there’s no reason not to.

Amtrak faces equal pay suit

02/04/2011
The EEOC is suing Amtrak for pay discrimination and retaliation, following allegations by a female HR manager in Pennsylvania that the railroad underpaid her because she is a woman.

How to prevent succession planning from triggering discrimination complaints

02/04/2011
Many companies design succession plans so they can spot the next generation of leaders early and develop current employees to their full potential. If your organization is involved in such a process, step back and look: Does everyone who is tapped for special treatment come from the same race or gender? Or does the chosen group exclude older workers or the disabled?

Complying with the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act

02/02/2011
In late 2010 the EEOC produced regulations on the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). The regulations provide employers with specific guidance concerning what information they may gather about their employees, how GINA interacts with the FMLA medical certification process and how any genetic information the employer obtains is to be treated.

Vague ‘unfairness’ complaints aren’t protected activity

02/02/2011
Before an employee can claim his employer retaliated, he has to show he engaged in a protected activity. But vague claims aren’t enough.