• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Discrimination / Harassment

When hiring, don’t overvalue interview skills

01/11/2010

Does your organization’s hiring process rely heavily on how applicants handle themselves during job interviews? If so, be aware that courts are often suspicious of such inherently subjective decision-making. If an applicant who belongs to a protected class can demonstrate qualifications that were at least as good or better than those of the chosen candidate from a different class, a court may conclude that interview performance was a smokescreen for discrimination.

No matter how implausible, you must investigate every sexual harassment complaint

01/11/2010

Here’s some solid advice you should heed: Don’t ignore any employee’s sexual harassment claim—even if it seems unbelievable or too incredible to be true. Instead, process the complaint as you would any other, investigate and then try to resolve the matter.

Can I legally refuse to hire job candidates who don’t share my political beliefs?

01/11/2010

Q. I run a small business and only want to employ people who are like-minded and share my core political values. Is it legal to refuse to hire a job candidate because of his or her political beliefs?

Is there any way to keep staff from speaking with former employee’s attorney?

01/11/2010

Q. A former employee recently sued my business for discrimination. A few current employees have told me that her lawyer has contacted them seeking information. Is there anything I can do to stop this?

OK to redistribute work as FMLA leave nears

01/11/2010

When an employee plans on taking FMLA leave, employers have to plan for the impending absence. That can include reassigning the employee to a less “mission-critical” job or temporarily removing responsibilities. Don’t worry that doing so will trigger a successful FMLA lawsuit.

Not all harassers need immediate firing

01/11/2010

If you have a robust anti-harassment policy and act fast to stop co-worker sexual harassment, you usually won’t be liable for that harassment. But that doesn’t mean you must automatically fire everyone who harasses a co-worker. You can use a more measured approach, including warnings and counseling. If that doesn’t work, then it may be time to terminate the perpetrator.

Firing employee who complained of harassment? Don’t let alleged harasser play any role

01/11/2010

Here’s a rule of thumb to follow: An alleged harasser should have no part in a later termination decision involving his or her accuser. Giving the alleged harasser any role in the firing is almost certain to spur a retaliation lawsuit, even if it turns out the harassment claim doesn’t stick.

Cut liability by acting fast following employee complaint

01/11/2010

Under Florida law, employees whose supervisors treat them so outrageously that they suffer emotional damage may have a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. But the conduct has to rise to a level that is truly outrageous. That’s why taking quick action after the employee first complains can help prevent a minor workplace problem from becoming a legal catastrophe.

Tampa enacts law banning transgender discrimination

01/11/2010

By a 5-to-1 vote, the Tampa City Council has passed legislation banning discrimination based on gender identity and expression in employment, housing and public accommodation.

Employment testing and discrimination in the post-Ricci era

01/11/2010

Like every other aspect of the employer-employee relationship, a variety of federal and state laws govern how employers can administer job-related tests. Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Ricci v. DeStefano that employers violate Title VII if they do not validate job testing results solely because they fear a lawsuit.