• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Discrimination / Harassment

Stopping harassment is mandatory, warning employees maybe not

08/21/2023
Employers are required to stop harassment when it occurs by taking reasonable actions such as disciplining the harasser. But do employers have an obligation to warn other employees about harassers in their midst?

Prepare for more lawsuits objecting to DEI

08/14/2023
In June, the U.S. Supreme Court decided two religious-freedom and -discrimination cases. One allowed a web designer to decline to serve customers if the assignment went against her religious beliefs. The other made it harder for employers to refuse to accommodate a worker’s religious beliefs. Now, a freshly filed federal discrimination lawsuit brings the two principles together for the first time.

CROWN Act spreads among the states in effort to prevent race discrimination

08/11/2023
Texas recently became the 21st state to add natural hairstyle protection to its laws prohibiting discrimination in employment. It’s part of a legislative trend to enact what are called CROWN Acts.

How to protect against the coming explosion of anti-DEI lawsuits

07/31/2023
When the U.S. Supreme Court in June struck down Harvard University’s affirmative action admissions plan, it wrote that “[e]liminating racial discrimination means eliminating all of it.” Now employers with diversity, equity and inclusion programs worry that their efforts to achieve a diverse workplace will come under attack, too.

Ask these questions when challenging employee requests for religious accommodations

07/28/2023
According to the Supreme Court, employers can’t justify turning down a request for a religious reasonable accommodation because of its impact on morale for co-workers who may have to pick up weekend or holiday shifts so their religious colleague can have the time off. However, nothing in the recent Groff v. DeJoy decision says employers can’t challenge up front whether an employee is eligible for religious accommodations.

A matter of morals … or discrimination? Expect more cases claiming ‘expressive association’

07/24/2023
The Supreme Court ruled in June that a Colorado web designer could decline to develop sites celebrating same-sex weddings based on her First Amendment expressive freedom of association. Now a different employer—a Catholic school—is trying to argue it has the right to “expressive association” in the employment context, able to reject applicants or fire employees who don’t live up to its views on moral behavior.

EEOC finding novel ways to drive industry change

07/20/2023
Not content just to punish discrimination, the EEOC is seeking ways to increase employment opportunities for members of protected classes.

Sink retaliation claims by engaging an outsider to investigate bias complaints

07/20/2023
Using an outside entity to investigate internal discrimination or harassment complaints helps prevent retaliation lawsuits. That’s because there’s no reason for an outside investigator to take sides in the outcome.

When evaluating religious accommodations, accept sincerity of employee’s stated beliefs

07/20/2023
The EEOC is pushing the envelope on how far employers can go if they want to deny requests for reasonable religious accommodations. It doesn’t generally approve of employers probing too deeply into why an employee might have a faith-based objection to following an employer’s dress and grooming rules.

After Groff ruling, how to accommodate religion at work

07/17/2023
On June 29, a unanimous Supreme Court ruled 9-0 in Groff v. DeJoy that employers must accommodate employees’ religious practices and beliefs unless doing so creates an undue hardship. Now, employers must revamp their religious accommodation process or risk litigation.