• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly
Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [2002] No such file or directory

Texas

State workers have limited right to challenge firings

04/06/2011
Here’s a reminder if you work at a Texas public university or another state-affiliated organization: Employees may have a “property interest” in their jobs. That means they’re entitled to receive notice that they are being fired—and to challenge the decision.

Log when you told employee about adverse decisions

04/06/2011

Employees who want to sue for discrimination under the Texas Code have to file state charges within 180 days of alleged discriminatory conduct. The time is measured from the date the employee learns of the decision. That’s why it’s important to document that you let the employee know he was being demoted, denied a promotion or is scheduled for termination.

You can fire worker out on FMLA leave–just show legitimate work-related reason

04/06/2011

Some employees believe that applying for or taking FMLA leave insulates them from legitimate punishment. They think, “You can’t discipline me because I just took FMLA leave; that would be retaliation.” That just isn’t true.

Terminating without giving a specific reason? Document rationale for the record, regardless

04/06/2011

Many employers don’t like to provide specific reasons for firing someone. Instead, they simply tell the employee that he is being terminated from his at-will employment. Don’t take that as an excuse not to document the reason you are terminating the employee.

Supreme Court: Oral complaints have retaliation protection, too

04/06/2011
Employees are three-for-three in employment law cases argued before the U.S. Supreme Court this term, now that the Justices have decided that an employee doesn’t have to complain in writing in order to be protected from employer retaliation.

Justify exempt status to avoid class actions

04/06/2011

It takes just one or two disgruntled employees to start an FLSA class-action overtime lawsuit. Be prepared to fight such lawsuits early and vigorously. Your best bet: Classify employees correctly in the first place.

Supreme Court backs employee following ‘cat’s paw’ boss bias

03/24/2011
The U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that an employer may be held liable for employment discrimination under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), based on the discriminatory animus of an employee who influenced, but did not make, an ultimate employment decision.

Require medical exams if they’re job-related

03/18/2011

You may have read that employers aren’t permitted to force employees to take medical exams because they could reveal a disability. While pre-employment, pre-job-offer medical exams are barred, there are times when medical exams are fine. The key is whether the exams are job-related and consistent with business necessity.

Supreme Court: Check boss bias before disciplining

03/08/2011
The Supreme Court’s latest unanimous employment-law opinion found that two biased supervisors conspired to get HR to fire someone. The lesson is clear: HR must independently check supervisors’ disciplinary recommendations to ensure they have no ulterior motives.

What can employers opting out of workers’ comp do to minimize the threat of lawsuits?

03/04/2011
Q. My company is a nonsubscriber under the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act and has its own on-the-job employee injury benefit plan. Is there any way to decrease the likelihood of employees who receive benefits under the plan later suing the company and recovering damages related to their injuries?