• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Texas

Employment Lawyer Network:
Texas

Michael W. Fox (Editor)

Texas Employment Law

Michael.Fox@OgletreeDeakins.com
(512) 344-4711

Click for Full Bio

Michael W. Fox, Esq., of Ogletree Deakins in Austin, has more than 30 years of experience representing employers. He has been Board Certified in Labor and Employment Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization since 1980 and is a Fellow in the College of Labor and Employment Lawyers. He has been regularly listed in the Best Lawyers in America in Labor and Employment Law, as a Texas Monthly ’Super Lawyer’ in employment litigation.

Court shoots down one objection to the new OT rule

10/19/2023
Robert owns 14 fast-food restaurants in Texas, all employing managers classified as exempt. That means he must pay them a salary that meets the minimum salary level set when the Department of Labor last updated the overtime rules: $684 per week.

DEI on the chopping block? Appeals court tees it up

08/25/2023
A federal appeals court just made it harder for some employers to defend against discrimination claims, and the ruling could set up a big Supreme Court fight that may put diversity, equity and inclusion programs in jeopardy nationwide.

ADA: Consider hybrid work as possible reasonable accommodation

08/07/2023
Under the ADA, disabled workers may be entitled to modified work schedules if it will allow them to perform the essential functions of their jobs. However, most courts recognize that in-person work can be an essential job function. But then there’s hybrid work in which employees sometimes report to their employers’ premises and sometimes work from home. Can hybrid work be a reasonable accommodation for a disabled worker?

Is working a 16-hour shift an essential function? Maybe

08/04/2023
The ADA requires employers to make reasonable accommodations so disabled employees can perform the essential functions of their jobs. Generally, employers get to determine which functions are essential and which are not. Courts tend to defer to an employer’s assessment of what’s essential and what is not when determining whether a reasonable accommodation is possible. However, it’s not a slam-dunk that they will.

Pregnant employee? You’re not their doctor and you don’t know what’s best for her!

06/21/2023
The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act takes effect June 27. In the run-up to that date, the EEOC has begun filing pregnancy-discrimination lawsuits at a rapid clip. For example, it just sued a bar over allegations that managers adopted a paternalistic approach to pregnancy, resulting in the firing of a pregnant bartender.

Court to Tesla: Anti-union meetings OK, Musk’s tweets are illegal threats

04/24/2023
A federal appeals court has weighed in on what management can do to dissuade employees from voting to unionize. It said holding meetings to explain why the employer opposes the union is fine. However, instituting a workplace rule that says employees can’t talk to the media illegally infringes on worker rights under the National Labor Relations Act.

Case of the Week: Ensure HR reviews, signs off on all PIPs

04/17/2023
When an employee needs to do a better job, supervisors are often the ones charged with creating a performance improvement plan. Since PIPs are often a last-chance option for underperforming employees, it’s common for them to include stringent attendance requirements. But allowing supervisors to set the terms of a PIP without close HR supervision can be a big mistake.  

Offer equal access to high-quality training

02/16/2023
A federal appeals court has ruled that unequal or inadequate training may be an adverse employment action that can justify a discrimination lawsuit—just like demotion, failure to promote and termination.

Appeals court: Federal contractors don’t have to ensure their employees are vaccinated

12/22/2022
In a 2-1 decision, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court’s preliminary injunction blocking a federal mandate requiring federal contractors to ensure their employees are vaccinated against COVID as a condition of receiving government work.

Federal court sends EEOC’s LGBTQ guidance back to drawing board

12/15/2022
The Supreme Court rules—and then what happens? You must implement the ruling ASAP. In time, the EEOC may issue guidance on how to do just that. In this case, the EEOC’s guidance went too far. Texas challenged the guidance.