• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly
Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [2002] No such file or directory

Wisconsin

Beware FMLA trap in no-fault attendance policy

04/15/2010
Lots of employers have no-fault attendance policies, which allow a certain number of unexcused absences without any documentation, and then punish employees who go beyond allowable limits. No-fault policies are fine—as long as they don’t penalize workers for taking FMLA time off.

Alcoholics still have to follow work rules

04/15/2010

The ADA protects people who are alcoholics from discrimination based on their disability. That doesn’t mean, however, that alcoholic employees don’t have to follow standard workplace behavioral rules. Simply put, alcoholism isn’t an excuse for poor behavior—and you don’t have to tolerate it.

Not rehiring FMLA leave-taker? Document why

02/16/2010

Employees who run out of FMLA leave and are fired under a policy requiring mandatory dismissal for excessive absences may be invited to apply for other open positions when they recover enough to work. Be careful how you handle those reapplications, especially if one of the terminated employees was off because she was pregnant and ran out of leave before being able to return.

Big win for employers in disability bias case

02/16/2010

Employers frequently worry that if they discharge a disabled employee, they will be sued for disability discrimination even if they had a good reason for terminating the employee. That’s because disabled employees may claim their disability was a motivating factor in the decision. Until recently, that was enough to win at least a partial victory in court. Fortunately, that’s no longer the case.

Follow your own rules, courts will probably side with you

02/16/2010

You just can’t satisfy some employees. They’ll always find something to complain about. But if supervisors keep their cool and hold employees to the rules, chances are a disgruntled employee won’t get far with a lawsuit.

6 years is long enough: Are quick dismissals on the way following 7th Circuit’s rebuke?

01/11/2010

Employers may soon notice trial judges dismissing frivolous lawsuits sooner rather than later. It seems some of the judges on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals have taken to chastising trial judges who don’t move fast enough. That could mean significant savings on legal fees if trial judges heed their brethren’s advice.

Transfer with same pay and benefits may still be an adverse employment action

01/11/2010

Employees who are transferred to another position with fewer or less important responsibilities may use the transfer as a basis for an employment discrimination lawsuit. That’s true even if the transfer doesn’t come with less pay or fewer benefits.

Don’t give up just because EEOC rules against you

01/11/2010

All is not lost if the EEOC rules against an employer during a lawsuit’s initial stages. Judges can refuse to let a jury hear what the agency concluded. Lesson: Don’t let an adverse EEOC decision persuade you to settle.

Remind supervisors: Don’t assume disability

12/11/2009

An employer that assumes an employee is disabled and then fires him or even just treats him differently than other employees may end up with an ADA lawsuit. That’s because the employee may not actually be disabled—but can still sue for disability discrimination based on the employer’s presumption that he is.

Be on guard against sexist hostile environment

12/11/2009

When we think of a hostile work environment based on sex, we often assume an overtly sexualized workplace. Transgressions such as viewing porn, posting lurid photos on cubicle walls and demanding sexual favors are clearly sexual in nature. But those aren’t the only things that can make an environment sexually hostile. Employees can launch a claim of hostile environment if they can show they were forced to work in a sexist environment.