• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Retaliation

Firing OK if employee falsely claims harassment

10/14/2008

Not every sexual harassment complaint is legitimate. A thorough investigation may wind up showing that one of the parties is lying. Can you fire the presumed liar if he or she brought the complaint in the first place? The answer is a qualified “yes” …

Whine not? Tell chronic complainer to just move on when latest allegation proves false

10/14/2008

Some employees have chips on their shoulders—everything is always someone else’s fault, not theirs. They constantly pester supervisors and higher-ups with complaints about discrimination, retaliation and general unfairness. How is an employer supposed to deal with such constant whining? …

Repeated warnings of fraud may be protected whistle-blowing

10/14/2008

Minnesota employees are protected from retaliation for reporting possible illegal activities to their employers under the Minnesota Whistleblower Act …

Good records make it easy to justify discipline

10/14/2008

The Boy Scout motto, “Be prepared,” applies to employers, too. You simply never know when—or why—a fired employee will sue. But you don’t have much to worry about if you have processes in place to make sure each and every disciplinary decision is fair and rational …

Follow promotion rules to stop unexpected suits

10/10/2008

HR can never know for sure exactly what’s going on in other parts of the organization. That means it’s easy to be blindsided by a sudden lawsuit. For example, co-workers sometimes spread unfounded rumors about who is up for promotion and who will be bypassed. Such gossip may give some employees an excuse to find a reason to sue …

Supreme Court to decide three employment law cases in ’08-’09 session

10/08/2008

The U.S. Supreme Court opens its 2008-2009 session with three employment law cases on its docket. Last session, the court expanded employees’ rights to claim retaliation under federal anti-discrimination law. This year, one Supreme Court case deals with retaliation, while two others address discrimination.

Investigate, follow up on all harassment cases

10/08/2008

Employees who complain about sexual or other kinds of harassment shouldn’t be left to wonder whether their complaints are being investigated. Employers should apply sound investigation procedures and then follow up with the employee who came forward to let her know the result. That’s true even if the company isn’t going to take any action …

No kid gloves needed: Discipline OK after employee complains

10/08/2008

Employees who complain about harassment or discrimination often mistakenly believe they are automatically protected from discipline. They’ve heard employers can’t “retaliate” against them for complaining. That’s true to a point. But that doesn’t mean that those employees get automatic immunity from any pre-existing workplace performance or behavior problems …

Retaliation can happen even in flimsy harassment case

10/08/2008

Employees don’t have to win their sexual harassment claims to prove retaliation. They merely have to show they were concerned that they might have experienced harassment …

Don’t fall into post-complaint retaliation trap

10/07/2008

Employees who file discrimination complaints are protected from retaliation. That doesn’t mean they’re immune from being punished if they break rules. Employers can and should take appropriate disciplinary action against them. The key is a careful and deliberate approach, devoid of emotion …