• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly
Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [2002] No such file or directory

North Carolina

Harassment ‘cure’ can’t burden employee more

03/29/2011

Employers have an obligation to stop illegal harassment as quickly as possible. But jumping at the first apparent solution may not be the best way to go. First, consider whether the proposed fix makes things worse for the victim. If it does, you’ll need to take another approach.

Don’t change termination reason after the fact

03/29/2011

Before you officially terminate an employee, make sure you have nailed down the reasons. That’s the official word—even if your decision is challenged. Here’s why: A court may see new or additional reasons as evidence that the first reasons were just excuses.

Supreme Court: Check boss bias before disciplining

03/08/2011
The Supreme Court’s latest unanimous employment-law opinion found that two biased supervisors conspired to get HR to fire someone. The lesson is clear: HR must independently check supervisors’ disciplinary recommendations to ensure they have no ulterior motives.

Durham testing company settles religious bias lawsuit

02/28/2011

Durham-based educational testing firm Measurement Inc. has agreed to pay $110,000 to settle an EEOC religious discrimination suit filed on behalf of a former employee who belongs to a Christian denomination known as the Children of Yisrael.

Severance agreement holds up, despite unusual promise

02/28/2011
Finally, some good news for employers! A severance agreement that releases all claims against the employer will likely be enforceable in North Carolina, even if the employee claims her supervisor promised other benefits.

Warn bosses: Talk of protected characteristics can flag bias

02/28/2011
Here’s a warning you should make sure supervisors hear loud and clear: No one in management should ever mention a protected characteristic (such as age, race or gender) while discussing a promotion or hiring decision.

Not everyone wears a halo: Courts don’t expect perfect work environment

02/28/2011
Some employees act like they expect everyone at work to be on their best behavior all the time, never doing or saying anything even mildly offensive. That’s just not realistic.

Veteran complaining of USERRA violation? Don’t even think about using that against him

02/28/2011

It’s often easy for employees to prove retaliation than whatever alleged bias may have preceded the retaliation. For cases involving employees who are also members of the armed forces, it’s even easier. They’re protected by USERRA.

Beware racial slurs–no matter the context

02/28/2011
Some employees will make any argument to win a lawsuit. Fortunately, courts usually can spot a set-up when they see one.

The key is consistency: Make sure similar infractions are subject to similar punishment

02/15/2011

Employees who break rules usually expect to be punished. But they also expect to be treated fairly. Most understand that employers shouldn’t punish one employee more harshly than someone else who committed the same infraction. And if that other employee belongs to a different protected class, savvy employees know that attorneys will be lining up for a chance to file a discrimination lawsuit.