• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly
Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [2002] No such file or directory

Ohio

Choose one when suing: bias or wrongful termination

05/11/2010
Good news for employers: When an Ohio employee sues for alleged discrimination under state, federal or local anti-discrimination laws, he can’t also add claims that he was wrongly terminated in violation of public policy. The other laws are his sole remedy.

Courts give employers benefit of doubt: Not all ‘unfair’ treatment is discrimination

05/11/2010
Courts don’t have time, resources or inclination to micromanage employers. Unless an employee can show she has been treated unfairly for an illegal reason like age discrimination, not every “unfair” decision will end in a successful lawsuit. Consider what happened in one recent case.

Words no supervisors should ever utter: ‘troublemaker’ and ‘get rid of’

05/11/2010
There is no good reason for any manager or executive to ever use the term “troublemaker” or the phrase “get rid of” in the workplace. No matter whom the comments are directed at, they can easily be interpreted as an excuse for some form of discrimination.

Counter retaliation claims by accurately documenting every employee complaint

05/11/2010

Employees who complain about alleged discrimination are protected from retaliation. But that doesn’t mean it’s protected activity every time someone calls HR to discuss what they think might be discrimination. In order to be protected against retaliation, the employee has to make clear that he opposed an “unlawful employment practice.”

Proposed Ohio law would be tougher than WARN

05/11/2010
A bill before the Ohio Legislature would require employers to provide more notice of mass layoffs than required by current state law or the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act. The new proposal, H.R. 434, would require employers laying off 25 or more employees to give 90 days’ notice.

Warn bosses: Think before you speak

05/11/2010

Lots can happen between the time words leave a manager’s lips and when they reach an employee’s ears. Simple comments may be misinterpreted as insults or, worse, evidence of discrimination. That’s especially true with language that might reflect age bias. Older employees may be far more sensitive to age-related language than their younger co-workers, managers and supervisors.

Offer training to those who aren’t promoted

05/11/2010
Your best employees are probably eager for promotions. But when only one slot is open, promotions often leave several well-qualified candidates disappointed. To keep disappointment from leading to lawsuits, consider offering career coaching for those employees who didn’t make the cut.

As a religious institution, are we insulated from discrimination liability?

04/05/2010
Q. I am the principal of a Catholic school. I’ve always believed that, because we are a religious institution, discrimination laws don’t apply to us. While we certainly never intend to discriminate against our employees, we do make decisions from time to time that an employee could challenge in court. Am I right that we don’t have to worry about discrimination liability?

How do we calculate the rolling FMLA year?

04/05/2010
One of the four permissible ways for an employer to calculate employees’ 12-week FMLA leave entitlement is to use a 12-month period measured backward from the date an employee uses any FMLA leave. For employers, this rolling 12-month period is the most administratively burdensome—and also the most advantageous.

How many lawyers do we need? Lawsuit names company and individual managers

04/05/2010
Q. An ex-employee who we fired just filed an FMLA lawsuit against us. In addition to our company, he also named as co-defendants the HR, benefits and plant managers, along with me, the president and CEO. We believe the employee was legally terminated. Is there any risk in having our corporate attorney represent all of the defendants in the lawsuit?