• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Retaliation

Ban former employee from premises; it’s not retaliation

05/26/2010
How do you handle a former employee who wants to come onto the premises and speak with other employees about her pending lawsuit? You can ban her.

Employees have 2 years to sue under NJCRA

05/26/2010
Current and former employees have up to two years to sue under the New Jersey Civil Rights Act (NJCRA).

Weigh retaliation risk when firing worker who has complained of discrimination

05/26/2010

Before terminating an employee who has recently filed a discrimination claim, consider whether the timing may provoke a retaliation lawsuit. Generally, the closer in time to the complaint a termination occurs, the more likely a court will order a jury trial. You may still terminate the employee—if you’re sure that’s appropriate.

Employer isn’t responsible if it doesn’t know of retaliation

05/24/2010

Employees sometimes get angry if they’re implicated when a co-worker complains about alleged discrimination. They may retaliate by ostracizing the complainer. But that’s not enough to hold the company liable for retaliation—as long as it never knew about the problem.

Unsatisfied whistle-blower may file lawsuit

05/24/2010
The California Supreme Court has clarified when a state employee may file a lawsuit alleging whistle-blower retaliation. The court concluded that if the employee doesn’t get satisfaction after an internal review, he or she can go to court for vindication.

Orland Park janitorial company faces discrimination charges

05/17/2010
The EEOC has filed suit against RJB Properties Inc., of Orland Park, charging that the company discriminated against Hispanic employees because of their national origin, sexually harassed a male employee, and retaliated against employees who objected to the discrimination against Latino employees.

Employee thinks he has you over a barrel? If it sounds like extortion, fire him!

05/14/2010

You know that you can’t retaliate against an employee who, in good faith, complains about alleged discrimination. That’s true even if it turns out that he was wrong and no discrimination actually occurred. The key there is “good faith.” It’s not retaliation to fire someone who is simply trying to extort a benefit by making a frivolous complaint.

Beware the cat’s paw: How innocent decisions create liability

05/11/2010

It comes as a bolt out of the blue: The Florida Commission on Human Relations notifies you that there’s “reasonable cause” to believe retaliation was the reason a female employee lost out on a promotion to a male co-worker. But it was a clean promotion process! How did this happen? As it turns out, this is the “cat’s paw” doctrine at work.

Choose one when suing: bias or wrongful termination

05/11/2010
Good news for employers: When an Ohio employee sues for alleged discrimination under state, federal or local anti-discrimination laws, he can’t also add claims that he was wrongly terminated in violation of public policy. The other laws are his sole remedy.

Counter retaliation claims by accurately documenting every employee complaint

05/11/2010

Employees who complain about alleged discrimination are protected from retaliation. But that doesn’t mean it’s protected activity every time someone calls HR to discuss what they think might be discrimination. In order to be protected against retaliation, the employee has to make clear that he opposed an “unlawful employment practice.”