• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly
Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [2002] No such file or directory

North Carolina

Cutting off good shifts can be retaliation

03/05/2013
When an employee complains about sexual harassment and suddenly finds herself under scrutiny—and sees her schedule changed—she may have a retaliation case.

Effective evaluations are management tools, legal protection

02/25/2013
Ah, the “halo effect”—the practice of inflating an employee’s annual review to increase morale and avoid the unpleasantness of pointing out underperformers’ weaknesses. Too bad the halo strategy sparks legal risks.

Different punishments for breaking same rule? Cite specifics to justify harsher discipline

02/18/2013

It’s reasonable to expect employees to obey your work rules. But employees can also reasonably expect you to apply those rules fairly. If you don’t, you risk a lawsuit. That’s why it is crucial to be specific when documenting discipline.

Have ‘the talk’ to stop hostile environment

02/18/2013

You can’t fire everyone who makes a stupid comment—or even two. But you also can’t ignore insensitive or offensive speech, just hoping for the best. The best approach is direct: Pull the employee aside and explain that neither you nor the company tolerate racist, sexist, ageist or other offensive comments …

Charlotte nursing home settles disability suit

02/01/2013
The company that operates a nursing home in Charlotte will pay a former employee $50,000 to settle charges it failed to reasonably accommodate her depression.

Bank of America cutting back flex, work-at-home positions

02/01/2013

Charlotte-based Bank of America has started curtailing its popular work-from-home program called “My Work”. Employee usage has risen steadily over the years, but now Bank of America is cutting back as part of a larger cost-cutting move called Project New BAC.

Isolated slur doesn’t justify harassment lawsuit

02/01/2013
Good news for employers worried that a single inflammatory utterance could land them in big legal trouble: Courts generally won’t hold an employer responsible.

When you need to trim workforce, focus RIF criteria on measurable factors

02/01/2013
The key to a successful, challenge-proof reduction in force is using objective, measurable factors to determine who stays and who goes. That greatly reduces the likelihood that a former employee who loses his job to a RIF will win a discrimination case.

Considering after-the-fact paper trail to justify firing?

02/01/2013

Move cautiously when dealing with an employee who complains about harassment and discrimination—especially if the complaint involves a supervisor who now wants to terminate him. Unless you have a pre-existing paper trail showing poor performance before the complaint, going back to create one is dangerous.

Steakhouse staff worked to the bone for lean pay

02/01/2013
Raleigh’s Brasa Brazilian Steak-house will pay $68,482 to 18 workers after the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division found the steakhouse failed to pay workers overtime when they worked more than 40 hours in a week.