• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Pennsylvania

Employment Lawyer Network:
Pennsylvania

Susan K. Lessack (Editor)

Pepper Hamilton LLP
Pennsylvania Employment Law

LessackS@PepperLaw.com
(610) 640-7806

Click for Full Bio

Susan K. Lessack is a partner in the Berwyn and Philadelphia offices of Pepper Hamilton LLP. She concentrates her practice in employment counseling and employment litigation. Ms. Lessack’s experience includes counseling employers on matters related to compliance with federal and state labor and employment laws, counseling regarding employee discipline and terminations, conducting investigations of employee conduct, including harassment, training employers on their obligations under employment laws and litigation avoidance, and developing employment policies. She defends employers in litigation of employment discrimination claims, wrongful discharge claims, and claims under federal and state employment-related statutes, such as the Family and Medical Leave Act and the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law.

Do pregnant employees require special treatment? (And 20 other tough pregnancy-related questions)

05/25/2010

Pregnant employees aren’t entitled to special treatment. Employers just have to treat them the same way they do other employees. If you don’t allow other employees to take leave or be placed in light-duty positions, then pregnant employees aren’t entitled to such privileges either.

When creating job descriptions, focus on ‘essential functions’ employees really perform

05/10/2010

Courts hearing ADA cases generally trust employers to establish which job functions are essential and which ones are not. But that doesn’t mean you can trump up job descriptions with “essential functions” that are never performed. Courts sometimes see that as a way to avoid having to reasonably accommodate disabled employees. They’ll only consider those functions that employees perform in reality.

Policy alone isn’t enough: Take the next steps to stamp out harassment

05/10/2010

Sexual harassment cases aren’t going away. Employers that don’t take such harassment seriously put their companies in peril. It isn’t enough to come up with a policy. You must also train employees at every level about that policy and explain where harassment victims can go for help. Then you have to follow through and promptly investigate harassment claims. Finally, you must make sure your response is good enough to end the harassment.

Worker–not just doctor–can prove incapacity

04/28/2010

The FMLA allows up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave for eligible employees who work for covered employers to deal with their own serious health conditions. Typically, employees must visit a doctor to establish the existence of an underlying medical problem that makes the employee unable to perform her job for three consecutive days. But what if the medical provider merely says the employee may be off for one or two days?

Consider shift change to accommodate disability

04/28/2010

Generally, employers aren’t responsible for helping their disabled employees with their commutes. For example, unless an employer provides transportation for other employees, it doesn’t have to do so for disabled ones. But what if an employee needs to change her schedule so she can make the commute to work? Does the employer have to accommodate the request? Perhaps.

Should we pay for employee’s drive from his home to a training seminar?

04/28/2010
Q. What if an employee drives his own car to a seminar that’s two hours away? Should he get paid for his driving time to and from the seminar, even if he leaves from home and drives straight home afterward?

Can we require women to repay maternity leave benefits if they quit before returning to work?

04/28/2010
Q. Our maternity leave policy offers paid leave for female employees who plan to return to work after the birth of the child. If the employee quits before returning to work, she’s required to reimburse the company for the paid leave. Is this lawful?

Is it legal to condition job offers on passing a drug test?

04/28/2010
Q. Our company wants to begin screening applicants for illegal drugs. Can we make job offers conditioned on the results of a drug test?

Can we limit cash awards to just some employees?

04/28/2010
Q. When we win contracts, we recognize employees with cash awards. But these awards may be given only to the select few employees who were involved. Is this legally OK?

Why should we keep our policy of not providing references for former employees?

04/28/2010
Q. We have a few supervisors who think it’s OK to write reference letters only for “good” employees. But our policy says supervisors can’t issue reference letters for any current or former employee. I’m having a hard time finding a reason that justifies our policy. Any suggestions?