• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Employment Law

No haircut, no job: Was it discrimination?

07/15/2009

A jury will decide whether Wackenhut Inc. discriminated against Lord Osunfarian Xodus when the security firm turned him down for a security guard position. Xodus, a Chicagoan who practices Rastafari, claimed he lost out on the job after he refused to cut his dreadlocks for religious reasons.

HR CSI: How to conduct a post-mortem of a legal claim

07/14/2009

If you’ve ever been caught up in an employment lawsuit, chances are you couldn’t wait for it to be over. Yet every case presents a valuable opportunity to prevent future problems and improve HR effectiveness by conducting an “autopsy” of the claim.

Religious accommodations: Must you let employee wear a nose ring?

07/14/2009

Federal anti-discrimination law says employers must try to “reasonably accommodate” employees’ “sincerely held religious beliefs or practices,” as long as the accommodations wouldn’t place an undue hardship on their organizations. What religious practices would be deemed legitimate in the EEOC’s eyes?

Job tasks changing? Don’t forget the FLSA

07/13/2009

Employees whose job tasks have changed may now be wrongly classified as exempt from overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act. That’s a lawsuit waiting to happen, one that could quickly eat up any temporary savings you’re trying to achieve—especially if it turns into a class-action suit.

Penalize the worst of the worst more harshly

07/13/2009

There’s good news if you use objective and measurable productivity and goal targets to determine whether employees will receive promotions and pay increases. You can distinguish between degrees of failure to meet those goals.

In Brookville, if you’re going commando, you’re going home

07/13/2009

The Brookville, Fla., City Council has approved a new dress code for municipal employees, requiring them to observe “strict personal hygiene,” including the use of deodorant. An “observable lack of undergarments” is explicitly forbidden.

Institute strict ‘no race talk’ policy to help minimize harassment claims

07/13/2009

For years, employers have grappled with what constitutes a hostile work environment and what does not. There’s a way to end pointless arguments about whether speech or conduct is racially offensive—and prevent potential problems down the line. Implement a policy that clearly bans race banter.

Beware unintended consequence of staff realignments: More retaliation suits

07/13/2009

Many employers are trying to do more with less these days, and that often means moving staff into new roles. Not every employee embraces that kind of change. Some might even see a transfer as some kind of retaliation, especially if they have recently complained about discrimination. Fortunately, courts seldom consider reassignments as adverse employment actions.

The easiest way to win discrimination cases: Prove you treat everyone equally

07/13/2009

Employees who sue current or past employers have the burden of proving that discrimination took place. But that doesn’t mean employers should sit back and wait for employees to fail in court. In fact, you should always be ready to prove that you treated everyone equally.

Fire with caution if employee has just asked for FMLA leave

07/13/2009

Employees who know they are in trouble often try to protect themselves by asking for FMLA leave. That tactic might work only if the employee can show he was eligible for it.