• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Employment Law

Court lets employer ask EEOC about credit checks

06/30/2011
In an unusual twist, a federal trial court considering an Ohio case has permitted an employer being sued by the EEOC to ask pointed questions about the EEOC’s own hiring practices.

Court: Lawsuit over anti-gay harassment won’t fly because Title VII doesn’t cover it

06/30/2011
An employee who claimed a hostile work environment after co-workers harassed him for being gay has lost his lawsuit because Title VII of the Civil Rights Act does not include anti-gay harassment as a legal cause of action.

OK to fire worker who has taken FMLA leave–but you had better be prepared to explain why

06/30/2011
Courts are suspicious when em­ployees who have recently returned from FMLA leave are suddenly fired. Yet, chances are you will at some point have to terminate an employee following FMLA leave. Just make sure you can explain why, backed up by solid and contemporaneous documentation.

Ohio Supreme Court fills gap for those fired after injury, but before filing for workers’ comp

06/30/2011
The Supreme Court of Ohio has just created a new avenue for at-will employees who are discharged and want to claim their firing violates public policy. In the following case, the court ruled that employees who are fired after reporting an on-the-job injury but before they have a chance to file a workers’ compensation claim can sue for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy.

Worker pregnant? At least say, ‘Congratulations!’

06/30/2011

Here’s a tip that can save needless hassle: Tell managers and super­visors they should greet every pregnancy announcement with a big smile and a hearty “Congratulations!” That’s because at least one federal court in Ohio has used a supervisor’s silence as possible circumstantial evi­dence that the pregnant employee was discharged because she was expecting.

What are the rules on unpaid interns?

06/30/2011
Q. We have received résumés from many college students looking for unpaid positions this fall. Would we need to pay these interns?

Title company’s closing costs may include damages for age bias

06/30/2011
A 69-year-old woman who has worked for Central Title, a Tyler County title company, since 1992 is suing her former employer, claiming she was a victim of age discrimination.

Truck driver files race suit against Alice energy company

06/30/2011
A former employee of Texas Energy Service is suing the company under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, alleging it fired him because he is black.

‘Pops’ sues for discrimination after firing

06/30/2011
An East Texas sales manager who claims he was fired while lower-performing, younger employees kept their jobs has filed an age discrimination suit against his former employer, Sagemcom Communications USA. He also accuses his boss of calling him “pops,” “old timer” and other derogatory names.

Punishing son for father’s complaint is retaliation

06/30/2011
In January, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Thompson v. North American Stainless that it’s retaliation to fire someone because his fiancée complained about discrimination. Since then, courts have had to reconsider the idea that only the original complainant can sue for retaliation.