• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly
Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [2002] No such file or directory

Pennsylvania

Beware union pact allowing arbitration and lawsuits

06/23/2011
Watch out if a union represents some of your employees, and the union contract does not bar federal discrimination lawsuits. A federal court has ruled that unless there’s a provision making arbitration the exclusive remedy, employees can simultaneously pursue arbitration and litigation.

Different discipline for ‘similar’ offenses? Better be prepared to explain why

06/23/2011
When you’re disciplining an employee, you don’t have to go into every detail about why she is being punished one way when another employee was dealt with differently. However, if the employee ever sues you for discrimination, you had better be prepared to explain the difference later—in court.

Keep it clean (and sober)! Ensure drug testing is uniform and fair

06/23/2011
When you offer employees a chance for drug or alcohol treatment and rehabilitation, make sure you treat them fairly. There’s nothing wrong with telling recovering employees they may be randomly tested for drugs or alcohol without notice. You can even use a “lottery” system that results in some employees being tested more often than others.

Remember: Discord isn’t always retaliation

06/23/2011

You can’t retaliate against employees who complain about alleged discrimination in the workplace. But what’s retaliation? Tense working conditions don’t always fit that bill. There can be many explanations for rising tensions that have nothing to do with a discrimination complaint.

Will PHRA expand to cover sexual orientation?

06/23/2011
Harrisburg Controller Dan Miller is lobbying the Pennsylvania Legislature to expand the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act to include sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes. For Miller, it’s personal.

Better be prepared to justify unequal treatment

06/23/2011
There are times when management feels compelled to treat some employees differently than others. That’s fine—as long as you can explain why and your explanation makes it clear that race, age, sex or some other protected characteristic wasn’t the reason.

Prevent retaliation claims by maintaining confidentiality of bias, harassment complaints

05/27/2011
It’s tough to pin retaliation on a supervisor who never knew about an employee’s original complaint. That’s why it makes sense to limit access to information about employee complaints. For example, there’s no need to share an employee’s discrimination complaint with her supervisor if it doesn’t involve that supervisor or department.

Remind managers: They may be personally liable for discrimination under obscure law

05/27/2011
Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, super­visors can’t be held individually liable for discrimination. However, the little-noticed Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 does allow individual liability for discrimination claims.

Despite EPA’s gender-equity requirements, you do have discretion to set wide salary

05/27/2011

The Equal Pay Act requires employers to pay women and men equally for substantially equal work. Gender can’t be a salary factor. That doesn’t mean employers don’t have considerable flexibility when setting salaries. The fact is that dozens of reasons that have nothing to do with the applicant’s sex may jus­tify different pay scales.

OK to consider stable work history when hiring

05/27/2011
A lot of factors go into hiring the best possible candidate for a job, including experience, education and employment stability. Those are all legitimate reasons to prefer one candidate over another.